Monday night ABC aired an interview with former CIA case officer John Kiriakou who was personally involved in the interrogation of al Qaeda's Abu Zubaydah. He details the interrogation process, including waterboarding. I'm told by a senior member of the Intelligence Community that this is the best information to date on the current state of Agency interrogation techniques and it is highly accurate.
Particularly fascinating was the discussion of email between the interrogators in the black site and CIA headquarters requesting permission simply to slap the terrorist:
"It wasn't up to individual interrogators to decide, 'Well, I'm gonna slap him.' Or, 'I'm going to shake him.' Or, 'I'm gonna make him stay up for 48 hours.'
"Each one of these steps, even though they're minor steps, like the intention shake, or the open-handed belly slap, each one of these had to have the approval of the deputy director for operations," Kiriakou told ABC News.
"The cable traffic back and forth was extremely specific," he said. "And the bottom line was these were very unusual authorities that the agency got after 9/11. No one wanted to mess them up. No one wanted to get in trouble by going overboard. So it was extremely deliberate."
Kiriakou believed that the closed circuit camera were real-time for others to watch the progress of the interrogation; he didn't realize they were being taped for quality control. While some companies might video tape their employees to make sure they're not dozing off on the job, the Agency was spying on its own to make sure its officers didn't double gut punch terrorists without Headquarter's lawyers signing off.
If you'd like to waterboard, press or say 'one'...
Given that the destruction of the monitoring tapes has caused such embarrassment for the Agency, I'm sure some CIA old-timers are wondering if all the political correctness has done anything other than hamstring the Agency and its officers with red tape.
Although he wasn't trained in waterboarding, Kiriakou was present when it was used and he experienced the technique firsthand in training. He discusses it in detail. What he describes as the way the Agency controls and administers waterboarding, it is virtually impossible to die because you can always give up and pretty much do so after a few seconds. Not to mention that water is not actually going down your throat:
KIRIAKOU:
You're on your back with-- your feet at a slight incline. There's some cellophane or material over your mouth. And then they pour water on this cellophane. You can't breathe. And it feels like the water's going down your throat. And then you begin choking it. It-- induces the gag reflex.
BRIAN ROSS:
But the water's not actually going into your mouth?
KIRIAKOU:
No.
BRIAN ROSS:
Or through your nostrils?KIRIAKOU:
No. It just feels like it is.
BRIAN ROSS:
It feels like it is 'cause of the pressure onto the-- onto the cellophane.
KIRIAKOU:
Correct.
In the old fashioned way, as taught to the military in SERE school, the process is much more prolonged and subjects the individual to real physical danger. The rest of the world waterboards the old fashioned way--they clamp your nose and pour water down your throat until you give up or die. In contrast, this is almost civilized--almost.
And Kiriakou claims this waterboarding-lite works: Zubaybah cracked in about 30 seconds. The information he subsequently gave was used to disrupt several al Qaeda plots and saved countless lives.
Kiriakou is a very interesting guy. He clearly believed waterboarding was the right thing to do at the time, but now believes it was wrong, BUT thinks it could be okay to use it again. He's not someone who's made the typical break from the Agency and is telling all because he's 100% convinced atrocities occurred. He thinks waterboarding was safe, effective and saved lives. By going on national television he's burning his career in the industry (yes, he's retired, but case officers rarely *really* retire). He's also alienating himself from all old Agency friends and colleagues by violating the code of silence, particularly on such a sensitive topic, damned to the world of talking heads. This is not what someone does when they just kinda think waterboarding was wrong, but might be okay again, just like it was before on Zubaydah when it turned out with hindsight to have been wrong.
Now after watching the interview with Kiriakou, I suspect that many Americans will begin to weigh thirty seconds of a physician-monitored Saran wrap-induced terrorist discomfort against the hours we go through at airports because of terrorists. This might be exactly what the Bush Administration is hoping for by allowing this spy to come in from the cold. Perhaps Kiriakou isn’t really violating the ethics of the shadows. Perhaps he’s sacrificed himself to save the Agency and his president. Kiriakou may well turn out to be the Ollie North of the rendition program--or just the next former case officer chasing a big book deal.




Kiriakou, while legitimate, just didn't appear out of nowhere at this moment by the grace of God. Stand by for interrogation videotapes to be leaked, to a yawn by the press and public now that they've been "pre-contexted" by Kiriakou and Ross. We're standing in lines for four hours at the airport because of these Abu Zhubayda and KSM. How many Americans are going to care that the twerps that brought that to us are gagging for 30 seconds?
Posted by: Retired | December 11, 2007 at 02:57
Nat Schlesinger killed his brother Jack, he stole all his money and then burned the place down
Posted by: DAVID | December 11, 2007 at 12:36
U.S. interrogation techniques are NOT torture, period. Those who are saying differently are incompetent or asserting propaganda for political benefit at the cost of American citizens. No, matter your political party affiliation, and setting aside your thoughts on issues. We all need to remember what it is to be an American Citizen. We need to make sure our elected representatives obey their Oath of Office and keep their Oath of Allegiance. See http://tinyurl.com/2znnvl Know whom you are voting for.
Posted by: Dr Coles | December 11, 2007 at 13:38
U.S. interrogation techniques are NOT torture, period. Those who are saying differently are incompetent or asserting propaganda for political benefit at the cost of American citizens. No, matter your political party affiliation, and setting aside your thoughts on issues. We all need to remember what it is to be an American Citizen. We need to make sure our elected representatives obey their Oath of Office and keep their Oath of Allegiance. See http://tinyurl.com/2znnvl Know whom you are voting for.
Posted by: Dr Coles | December 11, 2007 at 13:39
If Abu Zhubayda is to be believed, waterboarding may actually be a way for a detainee to reach God. He claims to have received a message from God after his 30 second surfin' safari to tell all, thus saving his brethern. In fact, it appears that he has actually evolved from terrorist into a new line of work, that of ongoing consulting terrorist-in-residence. I wonder which of the beltway bandits are going to pick him up after the Agency is done with him?
Posted by: Retired | December 11, 2007 at 15:04
Retired I don't doubt you, but do you have a link? I would love to read it.
Posted by: BillW | December 12, 2007 at 02:03
The Military is against torture:
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=125&article=50764
Helping inform candidates’ views on torture
By Joseph P. Hoar, and David M. Maddox, Special to Stars and Stripes
December 6, 2007
We have watched with growing concern over the last several months the manner in which the issue of torture has been raised in the presidential campaign — in debates and on the campaign trail. We recognize that campaigns are often more about scoring points against opponents than responsibly staking out affirmative positions. In too many instances, the debate about interrogation methods and prisoner treatment has lacked an understanding about the impact that torture (or as some have termed it, “enhanced interrogation techniques”) has on the safety of American military personnel and the values they fight to defend.
Posted by: Admiral Fallon | December 12, 2007 at 05:12
I think you are right, this guy is the new ollie, but with the internets, i don't think he will get to becaome a talk show host.
gen. hayden reported this to cover the more important story of the NIE and the Intelligence community and the Military Brass pushback against israel's demands to illegally attack Iran.
http://petras.lahaine.org
Even if Kiriakou is retired from the CIA doesn't he have an obligation to protect "sources and methods"?
His story must be one of those "leaks" approved by the CIA in order to bolster the argument that torture works.
I question his statement that the victim broke within 35 seconds. Was the waterboarding at the end of a long torture session? Also if he broke within 35 seconds, why did he wait until the next morning to begin to cooperate?
They are trying to desensitize us to all this bullshit. What was once obscene becomes commonplace and accepted. Or at least they hope.
We have a big mountain to climb.
I wonder if it was the phone numbers of the 4 Saudi princes (3 of whom are now dead under suspicious circumstances) and 1 Pakistani military man (now dead) that Abu Zubaydah gave up after 35 seconds (from Gerald Posner)? . Maybe he told them where the money on his bank cards came from (Boston, and the BCCI corp) and how it was used to finance not only 9/11.
Maybe he told them he was not bin Laden's driver but the key Al Qaeda networker for Europe, Turkey, and the mideast? Maybe he told them that he was one of the Algerian Six who planned to bomb a U.S. embassy in Sarajevo, or the embassy in Paris, or the USS Cole, or the Radisson in Jordan.
Maybe this was when he IDd KSM as the mastermind of 9/ll, and gave the CIA the name 'Mukhtar' as KSMs alias. <
Posted by: Admiral Mullen | December 12, 2007 at 05:18
Dr. Hillhouse,
Your tone in this post is unusual. Are you for or against torture? Do you believe waterboarding is torture? I believe honestly that the gentlemen who destroyed the tapes did the right thing by his subordinates. I believe that any criminality should go to the top under these circumstances. However, Kiriakous is clearly laying a groundwork that torture is ok, that it generates reliable information and is justifiable. A position which obviously resonates with the '24' crowd. Mr. Nance and numerous others have vociferously disagreed. We are now in a position where active military commanders (Guantanamo) refuse to state it is torture even if it has been done to our personnel.
The obstruction issues are enormous as well. The 9/11 commission and at least 4 trials I can think of. This doesn't even begin to address L. Johnson's treaty violations. Do you think war crimes have been committed?
Posted by: hope4usa | December 12, 2007 at 11:03
For a president who believes in death penalty, I think any discussion on torture will be just a round of lemonade drink. It is quite disturbing how a nation would stoop so low and exchange its sense of civility and freedom for some false sense of security.
By the way, Blackwater is the wave of the future. It is the embodiment of American enterprising spirit. So please leave it alone. It is less hypocritical to go to war for naked profit than to wage a war for abstract notions of patriotism. So just you know, we pay taxes.
Posted by: Pseudo deleted due to spoofing | December 13, 2007 at 02:36
1) Zubaydah was insane to begin with. His journals from before his "arrest"/detainment/kidnapping-in-a-foreign-country were written in the three different voices of different personalities. The man's intel was even less reliable than Curveball.
2) Is this another immaculate declassification? How did this guy get a massive media splash? It does produce a fine high-powered distraction after the NIE disaster; major sooper-exciting reports on the War On Terror generally follow embarrasing news.
3) If one is to designate something torture or not torture, it is worth having an objective criterion. For example, did the US ever prosecute foreign citizens for doing it? The US prosecuted a bunch of Japanese and German military after WW2 for waterboarding.
4) The personnel in the tapes is more interesting. Were there contractors involved? Were there senior White House people there, with creepily excited faces? Over and over the reports are the top-level people pushed for torture; do these people get lignin from it? If the wrong people are in the tapes, that would explain their destruction.
On Zubaydah:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/19/AR2006061901211_pf.html
Posted by: Jack Parsons | December 14, 2007 at 00:32
Jack Parsons - Great insights and commentary!
Much closer to "reality" than what any talking head in the mainstream media could offer.
RJ Hillhouse - Great commentary from you as always!
I'm a long-time fan of your site and enjoyed our meeting at the Marine Corps PX last summer when you were in DC on your book tour.
Happy Holidays!
The OSINT Group
Posted by: Anon | December 14, 2007 at 13:43
I believe waterboarding was used long ago like, say, the middle ages when good Christians were torturing everybody else under the sun for their beliefs. Maybe it was Torquemada who first used them or Vallery Plame?
In any case elections are coming up and the global warming crowd is heating up, too, with the fat man championing the crew.
The AO gets hotter daily and we are winning the war on terrorism (guffaw) and cracking down on those nasty terrorists while we push through the NAU, the SPP and pink, lacey,underwear for all copmbat troups outside the LZ.
The outsourced CIA are masters of deception and don't make a move, such as this one, without the express consultations of, well, you know who.
Torture is used by all front line soldiers and has been, and will be used throughout all wars for all time asymmetrically, of course.
Psy-Ops 101 and let the fun begin as the voting fraud heats up and the new fraudulent 'Commander in Chief' gets his/her bones on (*wink*) I shan't hold my breath. Oops...did I give away a closely held secret there?
Next step? Snowboarding, since the general population of these Estados Unidos has already been fleeced to the max.
Another great article, RJ, and some interesting commentary, kids...
BTW has anyone signed up for Embassy duty in the green zone yet? I hear it's pretty hot there now. But that too will probably be attributed to 'global warming' as the Milky Way continues to gobble up every galaxy in sight.
'scuse me, please, gotta go get my 'battle rattle' on.
Merry X-mas all.
OSS RA
Division 7
Department 21
Posted by: Vaxen Var | December 15, 2007 at 11:20